Re: regexps
Jamie Zawinski <jwz(a)jwz.org> writes:
I suppose a bound variable around re-search-forward, to indicate the
parsing style, would be the way to go. That, or a separate function
for new-style, like PHP does.
Or, perhaps, a new reader syntax for the new-style regexps. Like:
(re-search-forward #"(\s+)" nil t)
Or #/(\s+)/? #/"(\s+)"? Anyway, the low-level regexp functions could
do the dispatch on the object type instead of introducing new
functions.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi(a)gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta