Another XEmacs/Gtk status report... (and a poll)

Sorry about the duplication between -mule and -beta but the Gtk crowd and the Mule crowd seem likely to be moderately disjoint sets. -BP> Well, I have a XEmacs that runs using the gtk event loop This is very cool! -BP> Do people think a font menu is worth it? I can work around -BP> it in Emacs/W3 somehow (I hope :). The font menu would be -BP> replaced with a real font selection dialog box as well. -BP> Thoughts, flames, opinions? Oh, yeah ... I noticed that the font selection dialog image you posted did list charset registries ... which reminds me. I was recently browsing the Gtk documents (that I could find - libgtk-doc or some such package in Debian GNU/Linux), and noticed that they are still even more incomplete about I18N and rc files (except for a scary reference in NEWS or ChangeLog that "internal representations of multilingual strings aren't decided yet") than XEmacs's are. What are the odds that Gtk is going to work and play well with Mule? Anybody have an opinion? If Gtk is going to be futzing around with string representation, you might want to take a look at getting Ben's Eistring stuff into your Gtk-XEmacs as early as possible. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."