Oscar Figueiredo <Oscar.Figueiredo(a)di.epfl.ch> writes:
I made the same test with xemacs -nw and the problem does not show up
in that
case. The guilty device(s) seem therefore to be X-related.
I don't think you can include that so easily. terminal devices produce
much less I/O.
I have no idea how to trace the SIGIOs back to the device(s) that
generated
them.
Call select?
Jan