Re: Various problems

Steve Youngs <youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt; wrote: Oh, right. Well, doesn't it look like a compiler bug? The GCC info manual says (under "C Extensions -> Inline"): ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you specify both `inline' and `extern' in the function definition, then the definition is used only for inlining. In no case is the function compiled on its own, not even if you refer to its address explicitly. Such an address becomes an external reference, as if you had only declared the function, and had not defined it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ That's what we did, and GCC inserted an undefined symbol with the function name into the object file. That seems wrong. It's especially suspicious that the problem goes away when the optimizer is turned on. I'll pop over to the GCC lists tomorrow and see if this has been discussed. -- Jerry James http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~james/