On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 20:06 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>>>> "Ville" == Ville Skytt <Ville>
writes:
Ville> The binary package built with XEmacs 21.4.19 from what's
Ville> currently in unsupported/scop/vc in CVS is available at
Ville>
http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/xemacs/new-vc/vc-0.01-pkg.tar.gz
I have vc-0.03-pkg.tar.gz; I assume this is still causing problems for
you?
Yes, unless I remove auto-autoloads.elc.
Ville> Minimal tarball containing one Subversion controlled
file:
Ville>
http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/xemacs/new-vc/svndir.tar.gz
The file foo.txt is supposed to be empty, right?
Yes, it doesn't matter what the file's contents are.
For me, both packages have shown some abnormality, I get a "bad
byte
code" error sometimes, but not in the last couple of tries.
Unfortunately the backtrace doesn't print the byte code so I haven't
been able to investigate directly yet. Does "bad byte code" sound
familiar?
Remotely, yes, although I have got wildly varying errors and crashes,
nothing consistent so far.
I do not get a crash, with the locally built vc or with your tarball.
:(. Or :), depends on which way one looks at it.
If you run xemacs 21.4 with
[...]
Will reply separately to your other message on that.