Re: Future AUCTeX distribution

David> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: David> I don't mind about the CVS. But doesn't what's in the CVS David> end up automatically on the package servers (where nothing David> else is allowed if I understand correctly) and in sumo David> tarballs? People using the package servers will assume David> getting the latest version, and of course people using the David> sumo balls are counting on something reasonably up-to-date, David> too. I think one important point is SUMO. Most users I know, (and who are not experts) usually will tend to the SUMO version. I am just in the middle of trying to get the new auctex 11.82 version to work (the problem are mostly caused by the fact that preview is now included within auctex), however the delay is only caused by the lack of my time. I agree with David that it would be ideal if the core auctex developers would control the version to be shipped with xemacs, because well they are the maintainers and the even have made the (nice) effort to produce a xemacs-pkg themselves (the only other lisp package) I know, which does this, is x-symbol (vm seems to work differently). I have not even participated in any discussion concerning adding that feature (generating the xemacs-pkg). Unfortunately no other user came up as volunteer as a auctex packer. It is most unfortunate that xemacs, ui, pui does not manage 3rd party pkg, as does dkpg and rpm. However since I think that SUMO is important I will try my best to provide a sync with 11.82 and can hope that in the future things will be more smooth on my side (and that the structure of auctex will stay the way it is at least for the near future.) Uwe