Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] AUCTeX 11.84 released
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
David Kastrup writes:
> Yup, what I said: XEmacs developers _will_ deny that anybody is
> interested in AUCTeX.
*sigh*
I give up. If somebody else wants to deal with David's insults and
misrepresentations, feel free.
No problem will go away by "dealing with David's insults and
misrepresentations". That is a waste of time. The only way the
problem will go away is by providing an up-to-date AUCTeX package.
This can be done by either a) changing the policies and allow upstream
to provide it or b) providing it yourself in the way you want, modeled
on a _finished_, _complete_, and _working_ XEmacs package provided by
upstream.
Everything else is a complete and utter waste of time of all involved
parties, and the sooner you give up on it, the better. XEmacs users
are not served with excuses and finger-pointing, but with code.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta