On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Jeff Sparkes <jsparkes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>(NOTE how terrible small the hebrew font is. This does not occur
when
> gtk is disabled.)
I have yet to delve into how pango picks its fonts. This is handled by
PangoFontSet. How we're going to expose that in lisp is going to be a
problem.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> wrote:
> >> "Jeff" == Jeff Sparkes <jsparkes(a)gmail.com> writes:
>
> > You're right. I just compared to FSF emacs.
> > It's displaying differently, but not correctly.
> > Sorry for the confusion.
>
> Well it depends with which version of GNU emacs you compare, 23 has no
> BIDI support 24 has, although I am not sure whether it is in mainstream
> or just in git.
>
There's a difference between viewing and editing a file. Try refreshing
with ^L.
I'm not sure how to type Hebrew, but when I open a file in Hebrew, it
displays the same as emacs24 on Ubuntu does.
Well, the font is not as good. A screenshot:
http://i.imgur.com/KuOCyFa.png
I also just checked in a change that stops pango from overwriting segments
in different fonts.
--
Jeff Sparkes
jsparkes(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta