Re: folding.el 2.93 : questions for merging into text-modes package
|--==> "SC" == Sean Champ <junctionxyz(a)mediaone.net> writes:
SC> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:18:01AM +1000, Steve Youngs wrote:
>That's cool, take your time. One question though, why are
you
>sync'ing to a beta version? Isn't there a stable version?
SC> There is a stable version; a diff between the "stable" and
"lastest
SC> beta" version shows no difference
OK, fair enough.
>I don't understand why you think you need write access to CVS,
the
>sources are available via anonymous pserver access.
SC> The way i saw it, if i needed to submit a diff that was between the
SC> current XEmacs folding.el and an /untouched/ version of the upstream
SC> folding.el, then, for the full synch, i'll have to submit two diffs:
SC> one between the current XEmacs version and the untouched upstream
SC> source, and another with (load-library "folding-dep") added to the
SC> diffed folding.el.
Just submit a single diff (our-folding -> upstream-folding+dep). And
attach/include a copy of your new folding-dep.el.
The polite thing to do is to comment your change in folding.el (;;
XEmacs change: blah blah), and if possible, wrap it in something so
the '(require 'folding-dep)' is only done when run on XEmacs.
You're very welcome to send a diff & folding-dep.el to the upstream
maintainers yourself, or I can take care of it for you. Either way,
could you please let me know what you've done.
Thanks heaps for this, Sean.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|