Re: xemacs vs emacs
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
David Kastrup writes:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> > agree that it's friendly. Of course neither is happy that the
> > combination of Apple's IP and FSF policy make a merge impossible,
>
> I don't see that "Apple IP" plays much into this if at all.
Huh? If Mac OS X were free software, the merger would be difficult
(because of UI guideline issues) but not impossible.
I don't get your point. Windows is not free software either and Emacs
runs on it just fine.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta