Re: auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, *no* branch needed
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
> Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
> > I committed the new version right now into CVS.
>
> There have been no structural changes that I am aware of between 11.84
> and 11.85 (released five months ago), so I think it should be
> straightforward to use the latest released AUCTeX version instead.
The AUCTeX side of things very likely is, but if you've been following
our little comedy you'll realize that CVS isn't. We'll update before
the public release, I'm sure.
_______
right, since we did all the testing with 11.84, I wanted to have that,
hm, successfully submitted
(but CVS is more complicated sometimes....)
before switching to 11.85. which should then be straightforward.
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta