Re: next-single-char-property-change on xemacs vs emacs
David Kastrup writes:
Well, the Emacs equivalents are different here: text properties are
(surprise, surprise) properties of the individual characters,
Conceptually they are in XEmacs as well; the implementation is
different (heavier weight).
not of the enclosing object. So this "difference" between
"end-position" and "cut off" does not make sense here.
IMO it does. If the fact that text properties are conceptually
properties of single characters means that "end position" vs. "cut
off" doesn't make sense for text properties, then ISTM the whole "next
change" idea doesn't make sense for text properties.
I don't know if it's useful to make that distinction, though.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta