Re: subr.el (21.5.31) for 21.5.29
Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Regarding Re: subr.el (21.5.31) for 21.5.29; "Stephen
J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> adds:
As far as I can see you submitted a C patch and when we
talked about last time you found that patch too, hm
aggressive. I strongly vote to apply it, since I
have not found any problems so far,
No, *you* won't see any problems with it. The problems are entirely a
matter of style and clean internal APIs. I think it was Aidan (or
maybe Ben) who deliberately changed that particular API in a backward
incompatible way. I *know* that that implementation is going to
change radically in the future (it depends on Mule charsets, which
will eventually be reimplemented in terms of Unicode code point
blocks), so I really don't want to be bound to maintain any more
backward compatibility in that area than absolutely necessary.
So that makes it your call :-)
OK, I'll work something up for x-symbol and get it committed.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta