compare input methods: iso-accents-mode and quail

Uwe Brauer writes: I don't understand what the expected effect is here. It would be easy enough to write (defun pseudo-accentuate-internal (start end operation) (let ((start (min start end)) (end (max start end))) ; yes, this works as desired (save-excursion (goto-char start) (while (< (point) end) (insert (int-to-char (funcall operation (char-to-int (char-after))))) (delete-char 1))))) (defsubst pseudo-accentuate (start end) (interactive "r") (pseudo-accentuate-internal start end #'(lambda (n) (logior #x80 n)))) (defsubst pseudo-unaccentuate (start end) (interactive "r") (pseudo-accentuate-internal start end #'(lambda (n) (logand #x7F n)))) giving aeiou -> áåéïõ -> aeiou, but also bcd -> âãä -> bcd. Is that what you expect? There are also more complex functions that are available in latin-unity (`latin-unity-remap' and `latin-unity-recode' IIRC) that can handle translations to or from other ISO Latin sets. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta