Re: [Failure] XEmacs 21.0-b42 on Solaris 2.5.1
Dan Rich <drich(a)cisco.com> writes:
My build failed with the same problem I've had for the last
couple of betas.
Just to be paranoid, I pulled down a clean tarball and packages but still
have the same problem.
Here's what's happening:
at the end of the dump,
Dumping under the name xemacs
Purespace usage: 794672 of 794672 (100%).
Impurities:
conses used: 16993
conses free: 3371
.....
streams on free list: 2
stream storage: 517
Testing for Lisp shadows ...
Fatal error (11).
Your files have been auto-saved.
Use `M-x recover-session' to recover them.
[backtrace deleted]
Hey, I'm getting the same problem here. Backtrace looks identical.
and the Installation file:
[snip]
What window system should XEmacs use? x11
Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/dt/include
/usr/openwin/include
Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/dt/lib /usr/openwin/lib
Additional header files: /opt/local/include
Additional libraries: /opt/local/lib
Runtime library search path:
/opt/local/lib:/usr/dt/lib:/usr/openwin/lib:/opt/gnu/lib
Similar setup, except that I use X11R6.3, like so:
What window system should XEmacs use? x11
Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/dt/include
/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6.3/include
Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/dt/lib
/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6.3/lib
Additional header files: /apps/public/solaris2.5/include
/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6.3/include
Additional libraries:
/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6.3/lib /apps/public/solaris2.5/lib
Runtime library search path:
/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6.3/lib:/apps/public/solaris2.5/lib:/usr/dt/lib
Compiling in support for TIFF image conversion.
Compiling in native sound support.
No tiff, and sound=both
Compiling in support for GNU DBM.
Compiling in support for ncurses.
Compiling in Mule (multi-lingual) support.
Compiling in XIM (X11R5+ I18N input method) support.
Using raw Xlib to provide XIM support.
Motif for XIM here.
Compiling in support for CDE.
Compiling in support for Drag'n'Drop ( CDE ).
No. (I wonder why it didn't find them?)
The curious thing is that if I configure in a slightly different way,
I get a working version that seems quite stable which I'm using right
now.
The only difference was using some X11R6.1 randomly mixed in with
X11R6.3 like so:
./configure [irrelevant options deleted]
'--site-includes=/apps/public/solaris2.5/include
/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6/include'
'--site-libraries=/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6/lib /apps/public/solaris2.5/lib'
'--site-runtime-libraries=/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6.3/lib
/apps/public/solaris2.5/X11R6/lib /apps/public/solaris2.5/lib /usr/dt/lib'
This works. Something about X11R6.3? Note that the resulting
executable is actually using R6.3 libraries instead of the R6.1 (X11R6
is a linke to X11R6.1).
Weird.
Ray