ï¼ Jerry:
You don't need to commit or push to the xemacs-packages repo. Norbert
does that as part of the Pre-Release process. And you probably
shouldn't, it confuses Norbert, or at least his scripts. :-) hg view
on the xemacs-packages repo will give you the picture.
Norbert Koch writes:
I run into the problem Steve has been talking about.
Not really. I was confusing myself. You're just seeing concurrent
development happening, this is what *should* happen in that case. Our
"packages" workflow is designed to avoid concurrent commits (two
commits with the same parent) to make life simple for you. Jerry
didn't follow it, that's all.
Question from me now is (sorry, I haven't posed it yet): Is it
possible for me to pull and merge in the package root or does this
break things? Right now I get the message
abort: push creates new remote head b870d5948d75!
(did you forget to merge? use push -f to force)
You don't want to use "push -f", that's for sure.
It's always possible to pull and merge. The great thing about
DAG-based VCSes is that if you avoid commands like 'strip' you can
always rewind to any state you've visited before, so pull and (trying
to) merge is always safe, in the sense that you can checkout either of
the commits you're trying to merge, and work from there by hand to get
to somewhere sane. What you lose is time (and maybe some pulled-out
hair:-) trying to make the hg-merge commitable.
Looking at the state of the "xemacs-packages" repo on bitbucket, it
seems to me that all that happened is that Jerry updated the
xemacs-packages repo for you. This *would* create a new head that you
have to merge.
What to do: do 'hg pull' (no '-u') in your xemacs-packages checkout.
Then do 'hg view &'. You should see a long list of commits and tags
by you, with a tiny fork at the top. There will be one or more
commits by you on one branch, and one by Jerry on the other.
Do a hg diff between your head and Jerry's. I expect that the only
difference will be your additions to .hgtags, and the difference in
.hgsubstate. If what you see doesn't make sense to you, feel free to
post the diff. If it does make sense, do the hg merge. It may "Just
Work". If so, you can commit, and push.
If it doesn't, the conflict will be in .hgsubstate at xemacs-base.
Choose your line there. Jerry's will have a hash starting with
dbe31f6c32..., yours is the other one. Then do "hg resolve --mark
.hgsubstate", commit, and push.
Before pushing you might want to redo hg view and make sure everything
looks sane.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta