|--==> "CW" == Christoph Wedler <Wedler> writes:
>Oh, I didn't realize that you were referring specifically to
the
>info-look library. D'oh. Yes, if the existing library already uses
>overlay.el, we should require it.
CW> Fine. I hope that this means that my patch is approved.
How's this for a compromise?
I'll withdraw my veto and apply your patch. But I'd like it if you
could at least consider converting info-look to using extents instead
of overlays. If you don't want to, that's cool, I'll still apply your
patch.
I just think that we should be using our extents api whenever possible
instead of overlays. Now there's a nice little job for some
conscientious hacker, getting rid of overlays from all the XEmacs
packages.:-)
Anyway, thanks for your contributions, Christoph, I really do
appreciate them.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|