Re: Test release of new packages

Andy> At 05:37 PM 8/19/00 +0200, Dan Holmsand wrote: Andy> This is definitely a compile problem - I had this problem Andy> with the previous version and some defsubst's were to blame. FWIW. This looks like the VM FAQ: Q: Why do I get invalid-function errors? A: You didn't use the Makefile to build. The strategy VM uses is to collect all macros, variable definitions, etc into their own files. Then the Makefile defines the compilation command to be `emacs -batch -l vm-macros.el -f batch-byte-compile'. (More or less.) Something like this ought to work here. That didn't prevent _me_ from hacking the .el, and byte-compiling myself into trouble (Kyle was remarkably gentle about correcting me ;), but it should make sure that the binary and source packages work as advertised if built from the Makefile. If JDE is already doing something like this, then please excuse the interruption.... -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."