On 04 Mar 2002, Stephen J. Turnbull said:
Both, actually. The Euro and the rapidly increasing prevalence of
Unicode makes this a no-brainer. For now, just file-coding, though.
(Assuming that you consider a Mule with both hind legs broken
"full-blown".)
`A MULE without the 20Mb of MULE-related packages that I'll never use'
is more my concern. (It'd push me over disk quotas on the two sites
where I'm forced by dint of clueless admins to maintain a shared xemacs
out of my $HOME.)
(The lack of code in the xemacs to handle cases I'll never see (CCL and
so forth) is not as important to me; it's more elegant to discard that
sort of stuff if I know for certain that it's a waste of time though.
It's not as though the MULE *code* is that large compared to all the
Lisp.)
--
`Frankly I wonder whether you are not writing your posts from underneath a
bridge.' --- Jason Clifford, to a particularly dense troll