Re: Possible GPL violation in package distribution
-- "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> spake thusly:
Valdis> Umm.. how is this any different than the "RedHat
Valdis> distributed a GCC 2.96 snapshot that won't compile the
Valdis> kernel correctly" problem?
System software has an explicit exception in the GPL. XEmacs doesn't
qualify.
What, you mean to say that Emacs isn't an OS? ;-)
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 232 bytes)