Re: Notes and Thoughts From The Desk of XBRM.

|--==> "FS" == Frank Schmitt <ich(a)frank-schmitt.net&gt; writes: FS> Steve Youngs <youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: FS> I would strongly vote for some kind of public bug-database. Perhaps FS> Bugzilla is a bit too big but something like this. I'd think of this: FS> Bug-ID | Date | Status | Importance | concerned versions | FS> Platforms | Description FS> where Bug-ID is a unique identifier FS> Date the date when the bug was submitted FS> Status one of new, confirmed, not reproduceable, fix postponed (because FS> something different has to be done first}, in work or fixed. FS> Importance perhaps something like cosmetic, normal, critical FS> Concerned versions the branches which are affected and the version / FS> date when the bug was introduced FS> Platforms the platforms where the bug is active FS> Description a short description about the symptoms of the bug and a link FS> to the full bug report and the steps how to reproduce it. FS> I'm no coder, but if somebody volunteers in setting this up, I hereby FS> volunteer to help keeping it up-to-date. A proper bug tracking system is something that XEmacs definitely needs. Maybe we should look into something like Bugzilla, I know people have suggested it before (Robin?). Personally, I'd prefer something with an XEmacs front-end, but if someone can come up with some lisp to make XEmacs talk to Bugzilla, that'd be cool. Thanks very much for the suggestion, Frank. I'll definitely keep you in mind for the job of "bug-tracker". -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|