[COMMENTS?] Re: DND for XEmacs 21

Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch&gt; writes: Sure. I just read through all the topics I mentioned (extents, buffer-locals, etc.) and it is as you say. One thing I'm currently thinking about is the following: Should the dragdrop-drop-rules (or whatever it is called: -hook, -function) which is set in extents, buffers, etc. to get the thing to do something appropiate with the dropped data be some predefined list of source/dest/action associations (as in hm--html-mode, internal-drag-and-drop, idd), or should I use a function, where the programmer/user of the mode can do whatever he wants (plus a set of standart functions defined in dragdrop.el)? Personally I think that the function would be the better way, because the extents and buffer-locals still give you full control what to do depending on the source (and perhaps the destination -- but this is difficult if the source is outside of XEmacs). Any comments? Regards, Oliver.