Per Abrahamsen writes:
Qt 2.0 (QPL) did change the political situation, as it is now under
a certified Open Source license. However, the legal situation is
exectly the same as before. The legal problem has never been with
the Qt license, but with the GPL. It still depends on whether the
law would consider Qt to fall under this clause:
GPL> However, as a special exception, the source code distributed
GPL> need not include anything that is normally distributed (in
GPL> either source or binary form) with the major components
GPL> (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the operating system on which
GPL> the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies
GPL> the executable.
An alternative to betting on what the law would say, is to get a
"special exception" from the copyright holder.
XEmacs can be linked with motif libraries (no opensource)
is this relevant to clarify/obfuscate the current issue?