[PATCH] issue 757, return system metrics num-color-cells for tty
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
I'm wondering about the use of log2 in the patch.
1. Is it always available? Configure doesn't check for it.
2. I don't do any casting to int. This works for gcc; is it okay for other
compilers?
--
Jeff Sparkes
jsparkes(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
Attachments:
- tty.patch (text/x-patch — 2.5 KB)
- attachment.html (text/html — 336 bytes)
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:17:52AM -0400, Jeff Sparkes wrote:
I'm wondering about the use of log2 in the patch.
1. Is it always available? Configure doesn't check for it.
2. I don't do any casting to int. This works for gcc; is it okay for other
compilers?
log2 manpage says
CONFORMING TO
C99, POSIX.1-2001. The variant returning double also conforms to SVr4,
4.3BSD, C89.
so looks like it has been around for a while. The alternative is using log(x)/log(2)
which is probably what it does internaly anyway on most systems.
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Jeff Sparkes <jsparkes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2. I don't do any casting to int. This works for gcc; is it okay
for other
compilers?
Does it work if you compile with g++?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
Yes, no warnings. Also clang,
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Jeff Sparkes
<jsparkes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. I don't do any casting to int. This works for gcc; is it okay for
other
> compilers?
Does it work if you compile with g++?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
Jeff Sparkes
jsparkes(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
4779
days inactive
4781
days old
3 comments
3 participants
tags (0)
participants (3)
-
Jeff Sparkes -
Jerry James -
Richard