Mats Lidell wrote:
>>>>> Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
> I'm a little unclear on whether we are still using the convention of
> tagging changes like this with
> ;; XEmacs change
> Can someone clarify that for me?
I assumed it stood out as a local change without the XEmacs change
comment but I have no problem with adding that.
I see enough code like this (an alternative has been commented out) that
if I came across it for the first time, I would not assume this was a
local change.
> Mats, do you have commit access to the gnus package?
I think so but I'll need to push to be sure ;-)
So it is OK if I'll add an XEmacs change comment and push?
Yes, that sounds fine.
cheers,
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches