On Saturday 15 March 2008, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> This is hopefully part of the fix for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/435107
In the bugzilla notes you mentioned submitting the patch upstream.
Who's the upstream provider in this
case--gnus.org or xemacs.org?
xemacs.org (I submitted the patch there).
I see that timer-list is only used once in gnus, so the patch looks
okay
to me. But I'd like to minimize the number of patches that the XEmacs
package has relative to
gnus.org releases.
I think the way I patched mm-decode.el, the change should be acceptable in
gnus.org too.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches