Re: [S 21.5] -Wdeclaration-after-statement support
>>>> "Jerry" == Jerry James
<james(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Jerry> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> What do you think about redesigning the logic so that if
> with_compiler != with_xemacs_compiler two separate runs of the
> tests are done, with their own values of __GCC and __GCC_MINOR?
Jerry> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. I'll try to get to it
Jerry> in the next few days, unless somebody else wants to grab
Jerry> the glory.
Please drop a line to xemacs-beta or xemacs-design if you start on
it. I want to review configure for Xft-related bugs, and I've worked
on the with_xemacs_compiler stuff before, so I *could* do that too.
However, my time frame is more like "next few weeks".
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.