Re: [S 21.5] -Wdeclaration-after-statement support
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
What do you think about redesigning the logic so that if
with_compiler
!= with_xemacs_compiler two separate runs of the tests are done, with
their own values of __GCC and __GCC_MINOR?
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. I'll try to get to it in the next
few days, unless somebody else wants to grab the glory.
--
Jerry James, Assistant Professor james(a)xemacs.org
Computer Science Department http://www.cs.usu.edu/~jerry/
Utah State University