User: stephent
Date: 06/02/20 16:58:29
Modified: xemacs ChangeLog configure.ac
Log:
configure.ac comments. <877j7qqb0z.fsf(a)tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Revision Changes Path
1.490 +8 -0 XEmacs/xemacs/ChangeLog
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/xemacs/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.489
retrieving revision 1.490
diff -u -p -r1.489 -r1.490
--- ChangeLog 2006/02/04 02:25:47 1.489
+++ ChangeLog 2006/02/20 15:58:23 1.490
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2006-02-18 Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org>
+
+ * configure.ac (Mule): Mark broken test with ####.
+
+2006-02-18 Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org>
+
+ * configure.ac (Mule): Remove obsolete comment on XIM.
+
2006-01-30 Vin Shelton <acs(a)xemacs.org>
* configure.ac: Simplify cygwin include and no-X Xpm handling.
1.34 +2 -2 XEmacs/xemacs/configure.ac
Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/xemacs/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -p -r1.33 -r1.34
--- configure.ac 2006/02/04 02:25:52 1.33
+++ configure.ac 2006/02/20 15:58:24 1.34
@@ -4472,8 +4472,6 @@ if test "$enable_mule" = "yes" ; then
AC_CHECKING([for Mule input methods])
dnl Do we have the XmIm* routines? And if so, do we want to use them?
- dnl XIM seems to be flaky except on Solaris...
- dnl test -z "$with_xim" -a "$opsys" != "sol2" &&
with_xim=no
case "$with_xim" in "" | "yes" )
AC_CHECKING([for XIM])
AC_CHECK_LIB(X11, XOpenIM, with_xim=xlib, with_xim=no)
@@ -4481,6 +4479,8 @@ if test "$enable_mule" = "yes" ; then
dnl Only use Motif if linking Motif anyway, or don't have xlib XIM
if test "$need_motif $have_lesstif" = "yes no"; then
AC_CHECK_LIB(Xm, XmImMbLookupString, with_xim=motif)
+ dnl #### This is always false.
+ dnl Not clear what we want, although "yes no yes" is insufficient.
elif test "$have_motif $have_lesstif $with_xim" = "yes no no";
then
AC_CHECK_LIB(Xm, XmImMbLookupString, with_xim=motif)
fi ;;
Show replies by date