20 September 2005 Dear Steve, in your last message, you wrote: In view of the fact that I am not a computer scientists but only somebody who uses a computer as his most important professional tool, it would certainly be much easier for me -- and probably for many other users with a similar background -- if Suse would update their package for Xemacs. I will suggest that to Suse. Since, however, I cannot be sure that Suse will listen to me, it would most likely be very helpful if a representative of xemacs.org -- for example you -- would make a similar proposal to Suse. In this respect, I also do not really understand why Suse used a beta branch of Xemacs in their 9.3 distribution. Since I want to use Xemacs to get work done, I instinctively prefer a stable version like Xemacs 21.4.17 and would use a beta branch only if there is a compelling reason. In any way, let me thank you once more for your efforts to help me. With best regards Ernst Joachim #-------------------------------------------------------| | PD Dr. Ernst Joachim Weniger | | Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie | | Universität Regensburg | | D-93040 Regensburg, Germany | | Tel: +49 (0)941-943-4722 | | Fax: +49 (0)941-943-4719 | | Email: Joachim.Weniger(a)chemie.uni-regensburg.de | #-------------------------------------------------------|