- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Aidan Kehoe writes:
Thanks for pointing this out, Aidan; I'd forgotten whether hash tables
have a readable representation, and haven't had time to look.
> (let ((print-readably t))
> (prin1 really-huge-hash-table))
It's not obvious to me that this will be all that fast on input or
output; if you need huge, persistent, efficient tables, use the
database stuff.
Amusingly (?) enough, the GNU folks are discussing this very problem
(serializing hash tables) at the moment. Yet another decades-old
feature of XEmacs that they are just now getting around to.
Huh? Imagine if they were discussing consing a list, now would that be
a reason for condescension? Since lists have so long been a part of
XEmacs? Or something?
Just because the "GNU folks" are discussing serializing hash tables does
not mean that hash tables have not long been in Emacs, or that XEmacs
has a viable or documented solution for hash table serialization.
I mean, could you explain just what are you now being proud of? What is
the exact thing that you are claiming decades of headstart for?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Sunday, 23 November
Sun, 23 Nov
5:20 p.m.
New subject: serializing hash tables
David Kastrup writes:
Just because the "GNU folks" are discussing serializing
hash tables does
not mean that hash tables have not long been in Emacs, or that XEmacs
has a viable or documented solution for hash table serialization.
FYI, XEmacs does have a viable (YMMV) and documented (in the obvious
place in the Lispref) solution for the kind of issues of hash table
serialization I've seen discussed on emacs-devel recently.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
David Kastrup
Monday, 24 November
Mon, 24 Nov
12:03 a.m.
New subject: serializing hash tables
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
David Kastrup writes:
> Just because the "GNU folks" are discussing serializing hash tables does
> not mean that hash tables have not long been in Emacs, or that XEmacs
> has a viable or documented solution for hash table serialization.
FYI, XEmacs does have a viable (YMMV) and documented (in the obvious
place in the Lispref) solution for the kind of issues of hash table
serialization I've seen discussed on emacs-devel recently.
Shouldn't you have told the people in this thread about this first?
There would still have been enough time left for gloating over Emacs
afterwards, wouldn't it?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
5625
days inactive
5627
days old
2 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
David Kastrup -
Stephen J. Turnbull