define-key-after supported
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
Hello
I try to use package written for GNU emacs and which uses the
define-key-after function. I have looked up in xemacs-packages and
for example in haskell-mode/haskell-doc.el this function is used. In
general it seems not, since it did not work the gnu package did not
work for me.
So couldn't this function be included in fsf-compat?
Uwe Brauer
Ville Skyttä
Tuesday, 7 October
Tue, 7 Oct
7:04 p.m.
New subject: Adding things to fsf-compat (was: define-key-after supported)
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 19:29, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I try to use package written for GNU emacs and which uses
the
define-key-after function. I have looked up in xemacs-packages and
for example in haskell-mode/haskell-doc.el this function is used.
Hm, that's probably a yet unnoticed bug.
In
general it seems not, since it did not work the gnu package did not
work for me.
So couldn't this function be included in fsf-compat?
Maybe, I don't know about that particular case, but while at it, I'd
like to suggest adding replace-regexp-in-string there as well (roughly
equivalent to the XEmacs replace-in-string, but not quite).
What file(s) should things like these be added to? fsf-misc.el?
(Another, probably better idea, on case-by-case basis, could be to add
at least some of similar stuff into core 21.5 and (finally) get the
forward-compat package started :)
Tuesday, 7 October
Tue, 7 Oct
9:28 p.m.
New subject: Adding things to fsf-compat
On 7 Oct 2003, scop(a)xemacs.org wrote:
(Another, probably better idea, on case-by-case basis, could be to
add at least some of similar stuff into core 21.5 and (finally) get
the forward-compat package started :)
that sounds all fine to me, just a question
of the curious, what would
be kludge to deal with define-key-after? I mean which alias could be
use you must this thing be rewritten from scratch, I don't have access
right now to GNU emacs, and will not in the near future (very small
hard disk)
Uwe
Wednesday, 8 October
Wed, 8 Oct
2:35 p.m.
New subject: Adding things to fsf-compat
On 7 Oct 2003, scop(a)xemacs.org wrote:
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 19:29, Uwe Brauer wrote:
What file(s) should things like these be added to? fsf-misc.el?
(Another, probably better idea, on case-by-case basis, could be to
add at least some of similar stuff into core 21.5 and (finally) get
the forward-compat package started :)
What do you mean by core 21.5, the C part, the lisp part?
I now think that putting things into the fsf-compat library is the
better way, because this way 21.4 users (as myself) can benefit from
it.:)
Uwe
Ville Skyttä
Wednesday, 8 October
Wed, 8 Oct
10:20 p.m.
New subject: Adding things to fsf-compat
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 16:35, Uwe Brauer wrote:
On 7 Oct 2003, scop(a)xemacs.org wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 19:29, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
> What file(s) should things like these be added to? fsf-misc.el?
>
> (Another, probably better idea, on case-by-case basis, could be to
> add at least some of similar stuff into core 21.5 and (finally) get
> the forward-compat package started :)
What do you mean by core 21.5, the C part, the lisp part?
Whichever, depends, case-by-case basis :)
I now think that putting things into the fsf-compat library is the
better way, because this way 21.4 users (as myself) can benefit from
it.:)
To summarize the differences between core+forward-compat and fsf-compat:
If something is applied to core XEmacs (beta) and is considered useful
also in older XEmacsen which are frozen and to whose core this won't be
applied to, forward compatibility should be provided by including the
addition in the forward-compat package also.
If something is for GNU Emacs compatibility reasons but will not be
applied to core of any XEmacs version in the foreseeable future,
fsf-compat is the way to go (for all versions).
7505
days inactive
7506
days old
4 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Uwe Brauer -
Ville Skyttä