Somebody please comment on this (whether a repository move should be made, am I supposed make changes to CVSROOT/avail etc).

On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 16:56, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Allright, I think it's time to move 5 new packages from the unsupported > area to official xemacs-packages tree: ecrypto and sasl from > unsupported/simon, and docbookide, ocaml and sml-mode from > unsupported/scop. > > I suggest a repository move this time, since IMO it's not important to > have traces about these in the unsupported area. If a normal cvs rm/add > procedure is preferred, let me know and I'll do it. > > I will also update other stuff in the packages tree needed for these. > > Entries in CVSROOT/avail is needed for Simon to be able to maintain > ecrypto and sasl, and no extra entries for the other packages. > > Simon, scream if you don't think ecrypto or sasl should be moved yet or > if I was wrong assuming that you'll take the maintainership for these :) -- \/ille Skyttä ville.skytta at xemacs.org

>>>> "Ville" == Ville Skytt <Ville> writes:

> Allright, I think it's time to move 5 new packages from the unsupported > area to official xemacs-packages tree: ecrypto and sasl from > unsupported/simon, and docbookide, ocaml and sml-mode from > unsupported/scop. > > I suggest a repository move this time, since IMO it's not important to > have traces about these in the unsupported area. If a normal cvs rm/add > procedure is preferred, let me know and I'll do it. > > I will also update other stuff in the packages tree needed for these. > > Entries in CVSROOT/avail is needed for Simon to be able to maintain > ecrypto and sasl, and no extra entries for the other packages. > > Simon, scream if you don't think ecrypto or sasl should be moved yet or > if I was wrong assuming that you'll take the maintainership for these :)