well, i should be running with these changes, right? i still see the problems,
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes:
> yeah, but cperl tries to have a different syntax table inside of strings, where
> $ is not a backslash character.
> if you're feeling clever, perhaps you could fix font lock so it can allow for a
> different syntax table in strings?
As far as I know, this should "just work" with Matt Tucker's syntax
improvements. In fact, cperl was advertised as the biggest user of
But I could be wrong.
I'm sometimes slow in getting around to reading my mail, so if you
want to reach me faster, call 520-661-6661.
for the hell I've been