Gets my vote. Can you post to patches with a ChangeLog?
At 02:00 PM 4/25/2002 -0700, Matt Tucker wrote:
-- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)arsdigita.com> spake thusly:
> Andy Piper <andyp(a)bea.com> writes:
>> At 06:12 PM 4/24/2002 -0700, Matt Tucker wrote:
>>> To be automatically buffer-local? I don't know enough about how it
>>> works to know whether that's the right thing to do. But if it is,
>>> then sure.
>> Ben or Hrvoje or someone should probably comment, but not being
>> buffer-local seems inherently broken to me.
> Judging by the docstring, you're right -- it's supposed to be
> mode-specific, and in my book that implies buffer-local.
Fair enough. How about the following, then: