Re: [PATCH] Building packages with 21.4
* "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org>:
Hi!
Michael Sperber writes:
> I think this is too messy, and too confusing. I'd rather just factor
> out the names of the special operators---just like you did---and add
> the more exotic operators to a file in xemacs-base. We'll have to patch
> 21.4 once, but I think that's acceptable.
Norbert has already objected explicitly to the claim that patching
21.4 is a solution
That's correct, but if it's too tedious to fix this in the packages only
I go along. A practical and maintainable solution is a good asset to
have.
On the other hand, in my opinion the patch does not look that messy -
but then I may be biased :-)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta