Re: ps-print-nomule test package
SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
E Deweese and is only for use with Non-Mule XEmacsen. As soon as we
get multiply-versioned-incompatible-packages working, it should be
renamed to ps-print.
I still think it is overkill to handle it in the package system. Christoph
Wedler's x-symbol package also can handle difference like this. If I
recall correctly his solution is to have a simple wrapper that
actually loads the right file. I think the number of elisp files that
needs such treatment will be fairly small. In fact I agree if it isn't then
keeping up Mule vs Non-Mule will be very hard.
Jan