[Q] Some cosmetic namespace cleanup, glyphs.el, coding.el.
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Jan 15 21:01:48 EST 2009
Aidan Kehoe writes:
> 2009-01-15 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea at parhasard.net>
> * coding.el (force-coding-system-equivalency):
> Move three functions that we don't want to advertise to being
> anonymous lambdas instead.
Would it be possible to use flet instead?
In general, this kind of patch seems perverse to me. I understand why
you want to hide the functions (limitation to two namespaces is one
really sucky thing about Emacs Lisp), but I worry about removing the
self-documenting aspect of the code, and about things like Lisp
More information about the XEmacs-Patches