outdated url-library: is XEmacs still the next generation of Emacs?
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Mon Jun 7 16:09:55 EDT 2010
Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
> Thomas Alexander Gerds writes:
> > c) why not migrate to emacs?
Oh yeah, I forgot one feature that may or may not matter to you: on
32-bit machines, our buffers are still bigger (up to 2^30 bytes, where
I think GNU supports 2^29 (or maybe 2^28, but I always get this wrong
so let's put the bigger number as best guess :-). (We'd still be two
or four times as big on a 64-bit machine, but nobody cares about that
yet. Maybe next year. ;-)
More information about the XEmacs-Beta