Thunderbird and XEmacs 21.4.22
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Jul 24 04:58:59 EDT 2010
Rodney Sparapani writes:
> Well, what's traditional?
vi, nano, pico, xpdf .... (I'm pretty sure xpdf now handles URLs,
though.)
> Like I said in my other post (did you get that),
Yeah, I saw it.
> OpenOffice handles what thunderbird sent which was actually
> file:///home/rsparapa/Z.mtx
OpenOffice is most definitely nontraditional.
> I agree that it is very complicated. But, I figured the simple solution
> was to get XEmacs to understand requests like file:///home/rsparapa/Z.mtx
XEmacs *does* understand those, via the function url-retrieve.
However, changing the meaning of command-line arguments
program means is a recipe for trouble. Cf. the "Slow startup" thread,
where Apple has gone and broken the DISPLAY variable. Trying to guess
what is intended by these programs is a difficult problem.
> So, I was crafting an email with thunderbird to which I attached a text
> file.
> But, then I wanted to view/edit that file. So, I double-clicked on it and
> it asked me which application that I wanted to open it with. I chose
> /usr/local/bin/xemacs which is 21.4.22. If I had picked OpenOffice,
> then everything works. But, for text files, there is nothing like
> XEmacs:o)
There is probably a way to tell Thunderbird that it's talking to a
traditional Unix program that expects to receive a file, not an URL.
Traditionally in mimecap files that format would be
text/plain /usr/local/bin/xemacs %s
but I wouldn't be surprised if Thunderbird has usurped that format to
mean URL, not file.
I can't think of any quick hacks to make XEmacs do the right thing
with an URL from the command line. I'll try later in the week.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list