Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat May 16 11:59:09 EDT 2009
Mats Lidell writes:
> >>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
> That is true but if the goal is to make XEmacs GPLv3 too and we show
> that we are working on that I hope some migration period surely would
> be acceptable.
Maybe. Ask Cisco about that. Or Peter Deutsch. I think it's likely
that the FSF would make demands at a time we didn't want to make the
effort to comply, because we were short of manpower (not out of
malice, Murphy's Law). I think we're reasonably on track, we don't
have the manpower to do much syncing anyway, so let's just get it
> Stephen> We also need to coordinate the whole thing with SXEmacs.
> What is the position of the SXEmacs project on GPLv3?
That's not for me to say, but SXEmacs is not licensed under GPLv3 at
More information about the XEmacs-Beta