GPLv3 packages?

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Mats Lidell writes:
 > >>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

 > That is true but if the goal is to make XEmacs GPLv3 too and we show
 > that we are working on that I hope some migration period surely would
 > be acceptable.

Maybe.  Ask Cisco about that.  Or Peter Deutsch.  I think it's likely
that the FSF would make demands at a time we didn't want to make the
effort to comply, because we were short of manpower (not out of
malice, Murphy's Law).  I think we're reasonably on track, we don't
have the manpower to do much syncing anyway, so let's just get it
done.

 > Stephen> We also need to coordinate the whole thing with SXEmacs.
 > 
 > What is the position of the SXEmacs project on GPLv3?

That's not for me to say, but SXEmacs is not licensed under GPLv3 at
the present.