Moving to GPLv3 - the practical side of it

[Mats Lidell]

>>>>> Stephen wrote:

Stephen> That's correct (with the caveat s/copyrighted/licensed/), but
Stephen> Mats wrote "GPLv2", not "GPLv2 or later".  In context, I
Stephen> assumed that distinction was being upheld, but you're
Stephen> probably right that he meant files that mention GPLv2 without
Stephen> being specific about the presence or absence of "or later".

OOPS! Sorry for being lazy. (Maybe I should come up with some new
acronym so that it is easy to say "GPLv2 or later" in a single word,
GPLv2orL8R ;-)

Anyway in the previous talk bout going GPLv3 I always mean with "or
later" but I have been lazy and forgot to mention that important
part. I'll try to be more exact in the future since it is really
essential.

I also think that there isn't any pure "GPLv2" files in the core. At
least I haven't seen one so far. So we don't have that particular
problem.

Yours
-- 
%% Mats