Moving to GPLv3 - the practical side of it

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Aidan Kehoe writes:

 > If you’re releasing the entire body of work as GPLv3, individual pieces
 > copyrighted as GPLv2 or later, as they normally are, are compatible with
 > that.

That's correct (with the caveat s/copyrighted/licensed/), but Mats
wrote "GPLv2", not "GPLv2 or later".  In context, I assumed that
distinction was being upheld, but you're probably right that he meant
files that mention GPLv2 without being specific about the presence or
absence of "or later".