That "vision" thang...

[Andreas Roehler]

David Kastrup wrote:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
> 
>> My *vision* is that the most likely way to solve this problem is for
>> XEmacs to provide some killer feature(s) that you can't get anywhere
>> else,
> 
> They don't grow on trees.  They grow upstream, and upstream growth
> depends on core code and documentation quality and comfort levels.
> 
> _That_ has been the principal asset of XEmacs at one point of time.
> 


So lets come back to the roots.

Altogether as some problems described as "bloated" are
showing up elsewhere too.