That "vision" thang...
andreas.roehler at online.de
Sun Mar 1 09:10:40 EST 2009
David Kastrup wrote:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
>> My *vision* is that the most likely way to solve this problem is for
>> XEmacs to provide some killer feature(s) that you can't get anywhere
> They don't grow on trees. They grow upstream, and upstream growth
> depends on core code and documentation quality and comfort levels.
> _That_ has been the principal asset of XEmacs at one point of time.
So lets come back to the roots.
Altogether as some problems described as "bloated" are
showing up elsewhere too.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta