21.4 better than 21.5?

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

David Kastrup writes:

 > The "GNU Church of Emacs" doctrine that you are probably referring to is
 > the doctrine of keeping features out or disabled by default until their
 > proponents have brought the implementation to a state where enabling it
 > does not cause a major regression for other users (as well as
 > themselves).

Nope.  That's not the one.

If you want to help, David, feel free to report bugs in XEmacs, and
reply with followup data when the XEmacs maintainers request it.