reftex needs to be upgraded.
matsl at xemacs.org
Mon Sep 22 10:48:58 EDT 2008
>>>>> Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa at mcw.edu> writes:
Rodney> However, having looked at the results spit out for ESS makes
Rodney> me wonder what exactly you are doing. You have spit out a
Rodney> PostScript file for example. How do you license a PostScript
Rodney> file? IANAL, but I assumed that you were concerned with
Rodney> e-lisp files only.
The script works by artificial stupidity and goes through every files
it finds. If there is nothing that looks like a GFPLv2 or LGPLv2
license notice in the beginning of the file it is reported as possible
candidate for further manual inspection.
The script uses a list though of known extensions that is considered
to be safe, not possible to license. If Postscript files can be safely
ignored it is easy to add any extension that is applicable, I guess
".ps" is a good candidate here.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta