Fwd: sign off on XEmacs 21.5
dak at gnu.org
Wed Jul 16 07:12:21 EDT 2008
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
> > _If_ you are lucky, the results will be comparable, but not reached by
> > the same means.
> Well, sure. But isn't that the kind of argument you've never been
> willing to accept when I make it? You're the one who's been insisting
> for years that all that matters is the installation tarball unpacks in
> the right places.
You really don't get the difference between two packages being identical
and both having the full anatomy of an XEmacs package?
More information about the XEmacs-Beta