Unified file-name syntax?
michael.albinus at gmx.de
Sun Jan 6 07:20:30 EST 2008
David Kastrup <dak at gnu.org> writes:
> Uh Michael? As long as you are the only person responsible for
> copyrightable changes after tramp got relicensed, you can contribute
> whatever you want under the previous license.
I still ask Kai for such changes, just for the records.
> If few others have contributed (and done this under a working copyright
> assignment to the FSF), you need to ask them. They are free to permit
> you redistribution under the old terms, too.
Yes, but I'm short in time. I do not want to distribute the same sources
twice under different license terms.
I also believe that Tramp 2.1 shall be the version in the XEmacs package
repository. Tramp 2.0 is said to see security updates only (although I
break this rule again and again :-) And Tramp 2.1 does not exist in a
GPLv2 version I'ld like to maintain.
> It is a different question, however, whether it makes sense at all for
> some project to go to all this hassle when XEmacs is likely going to
> move to GPLv3 eventually, anyway.
It looks promising now.
Best regards, Michael.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta