looking-back - looking-at
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Feb 2 20:15:02 EST 2008
Andreas Röhler writes:
> AFAIS `looking-back' as pendant to `looking-at' is not
> available at XEmacs. Would like to have it for
> compatibility reasons, should I'm being right so far.
Not every 3-line function needs to be a primitive. What does it do
(*exactly*, there are a number of possible semantics it could have)?
Quoting the whole defun, especially including the docstring, would
probably be the best idea.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta