2007-04-27 sumo is missing MANIFEST.erc
mike.kupfer at xemacs.org
Thu Dec 18 15:04:16 EST 2008
>>>>> "ST" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
ST> I really don't like the idea of requiring people to upgrade when
ST> we've promised that the packages will support 21.4.
But what does "support" mean here? I agree that we shouldn't require an
upgrade of 21.4 before a user can install and run new packages.
On the other hand, I don't see a big problem telling package maintainers
and anyone else who builds from CVS that they'll need to upgrade their
installation of 21.4.
One thing I'm unclear on: does the problem affect users' ability to
recompile individual files or packages (e.g., M-x
byte-recompile-directory), or does it just affect people who build from
More information about the XEmacs-Beta