2007-04-27 sumo is missing MANIFEST.erc

[Mike Kupfer]

>>>>> "ST" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

ST> I really don't like the idea of requiring people to upgrade when
ST> we've promised that the packages will support 21.4.

But what does "support" mean here?  I agree that we shouldn't require an
upgrade of 21.4 before a user can install and run new packages.

On the other hand, I don't see a big problem telling package maintainers
and anyone else who builds from CVS that they'll need to upgrade their
installation of 21.4.

One thing I'm unclear on: does the problem affect users' ability to
recompile individual files or packages (e.g., M-x
byte-recompile-directory), or does it just affect people who build from
CVS?

cheers,
mike